Mossad and the CIA were supporting traffic in Afgan-opium-derived heroin -- devoting public resources to protect
and assist the suppliers and distributors of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered drug revenue deposits backing
the global investments of American and Britsih elite finance. The Afgan Northern Alliance druglords grow 70 to
90 percent of the worlds opium, the prime ingredient of heroin The opium which is moved across the small China-Afgan
boarder for processing and distribution by the giant People's Liberation Army, that amazing transnational corporation,
Triad drug cartel-and military super military establishment all in one. Against the tremendous-stake interests
this giant outlaw network, the morally conservative Taliban had been erradicating Afgan opium production, supressing
supply to druglords and the drug-revenue flow money- laundering establishment bankers and global investors alike.
Thus "crisis" became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA and/or Mossad in seeking ways
to defeat Afganistan's Talibanist government. (Nothing absurd so far, right?)
Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have criminal ties to U.S. executive James Giffen in Kazakhstan -- a man under
investigation by a New York grand jury in the months before September 11 for illegal involvement in an oil swaps
between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran (source: the Aug. 9 New Yorker Magazine for a full account of this by
Seymore Hersh -- and all of the evidence for this crime was being kept at the WTC on the 20th through 25th floor
of one of the twin towers where the FBI had its New York Offices. And James Giffen is the key man everyone has
to go through to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan -- including any pipelines built that would traverse Afganistan.
(There is $6 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.) Giffen certainly understood -- if he did not
originate the idea -- that if he could get operatives (even "captured" vengeful Islamic activists whose
rage could be shaped and directed to use of terror) to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC building and the documentation
evidence it contained, then he would be escape grand jury indictment -- and, as an powerful added benefit, the
(framed) Taliban would get
replaced with a regime in Afganistan that would permit a pipeline to be built -- preferably a Northern Alliance
druglord government that would harmonize with Giffen's own unethical (murderous) entrepreneural style. (See the
New Yorker artlical for details of Giffen's history.)
(So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people-- Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen - renegade
CIA or a Giffen "dark-side" Mossad link. But other, even more powerful players may have had involvement
-- certainly they stood to gain tremendously if the crashbomb frame-up were successfully accomplished. (Prior to
September 11 charges had been brought against Alan Greenspan (forgive me -- in a previous post I said "Milton
Friedman" instead of Greenspan -- Friedman is a great and honest and honorable academic scholar and Nobel
Prize winner -- who, very superficially, looks like Greenspan) -- at any rate, Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan
& Co. and other powerful American financial figures and instiutions had charges brought against them -- reportedly
a very well-documented case --over the fixing of gold prices -- with evidence for that case too stored by the FBI
on the FBI floors of the WTC! These parties would not only profit heavily from the "carrot" of both oil
and drug monies circulating through their great financial instiutions, but they also would gain from avoding the
"stick" of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the U.S. financial establishment (realize
what a guilty verdict in this case would mean to these leading financial families and to the Establishment in general!)
-- these parties would welcome predictable and certainly substantial benefits from the the destruction of the evidence
in the WTC and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.)
Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives who characteristically operate in secret and under
the protection of wealth, status and power -- both the carrot ($2 trillion in annual drug revenues funneled through
the banking system -- which has funded much of the proceeds to fund the development of the Princeling-Triad dictatorship
in China, btw, -- (The communist government has been in the opium business since the 1930's -- Mao pioneered the
model later followed by Peru's Shining Path and Colombia's Maoist F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists. And Zhou Enlai devised
the plan in the 1950's of weakening American society through a drug invasion.)
"China white" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army, made from Afghan opium links all banker
and oilman to the corrupt and renegade the secret state agencies, CIA, FBI, and Mossad -- renegade agents of either
agency may have seen this opportunity for mutual gain and found the way -- having profiles of each of the players
-- to propose the crashbombing frame-up as the best "solution" to each of players most troublesome problems,
while making enormous profits besides.
Note that the Bush's are tied to both the CIA and oil and, through Mena Arkansas drug smuggling and through the
Iran-Contra drugs and arms deals etc. (drugworld investigator Daniel Hopsicker, as well as Noam Chomsky and many
others have exposed this thoroughly -- at least in the broad strokes necessary to support this reconstruction of
the crime.) (The facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from the Russians, to the John Birchers, to
Wired Magazine, Harpers, New Yorker, the Village Voice, the Nation, and Rolling Stone Magazine, all having explored
the drug - Establishment connections in great detail.)
Which brings us to Ariel Sharon. His hard-head policy of retaliation regardless of collateral damage and his provocation
at the mosque cost him dearly in world opinion. In fact the Bush administration was very close to making initiating
a major policy shift -- obviously known to Sharon from the greatest intelligence organization in the world -- Bush
was planning the recognition/sponsorhip of a seperate Palestinian state. (Also war crime charges had been brought
against Sharon in international court, further putting his hard-line policy against the Palestinians in unfavorable
light.
Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely possible that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that
thought of the crashbombing frame-up plan in the first place decided to take the risk of telling Sharon about the
plan, offering it as a solution to the trapped old "freedom fighter's" problems as well. If the U.S.
could be made to think that the hated Osama bin Laden -- that Islamic fundametnalism itself -- is responsible for
destroying twin towers of the WTC and the American government itself, then, Sharon would certainly grasp, American
opinion would radically swing to an extremely hard line against all Moslem and Arab entities not securely under
their thumb, and most particularly, from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.
No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not close on such a deal, such a serving of his higher
good, his prime directive.
And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation.
The getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair. Mossad has infiltrated bin Ladin's forces
in Central Asia and the Mideast -- but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must be to remain viable)
and so it was an easy matter for this "dark-side" Mossad, with Sharon's clandestine approval, to trick
some very angry and vengeful Arabs into thinking they were doing bin Ladens or some other anti-Zionist or anti-
Globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four planes. Millions in the world hated the America and the globalization
that the World Trade Center represents. These recruited hijackers need not have been Arabs -- there are Croats,
Serbs, Latin Americans, and Iranians and any number of other victim-pool people who could have volunteered to conduct
the hijacking -- possibly without fully understanding the end result of the mission -- they need not have "signed
on" for a suicide bombing. (Many aviation experts on the net are describing a system built into commercial
airliners for taking over control of flight from the ground, a system developed to combat terrorism. It is possible
that the course of the plane's flight was taken over by this system installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in
several reports on the web.) But if the crashes were not effected in this way, psychological-control methods, wholly
sufficient for the job, were also available. The technology of behavoir control is further advanced than the popular
press has made people aware. Skilled psy op agents can get subjects angry enough and convinced enough of the justice
and good effects of "acts' represented as serving their 'cause" to be willing to undertake even suicidal
missions. (Activist Alan Yu has researched this technology as have other researchers from a broad spectrum of political
orientation.)
And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act.
But then what?
When the crashes take place -- word merely has to be put out by those involved (the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and those
complicit in the Bush Administration, (based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz) to push the theme
that bin Ladin was responsible and that this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only immediate appropriate
reaction -- since, the spin goes, the Afghans are responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and that "harboring
is exactly the same as terrorism" and that for that reason the entire Afghan government must be terminated
(must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's revealing phrasing of September 12.)
The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the perpetrators. Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting
that for the sake of the security and safety of Israel and the United States that it is necessary that the impression
of an "open and shut case" must be spun. (The news media is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime
correspondents" and sets about selling the blaming of bin Ladin and advocating war and overthrow in Afghanistan
-- because they have been deceitfully led to believe they really know who bombed the buildings; and among the elite
of the news publishers, they "know" it is in the best interests of Israel and Wall Street that this be
the response, that this be the spin.
And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.
And trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and supress criticism of the investigation -- after all, who would
know better than the CIA and Mossad exactly who is responsible? (The fact has been reported -- in a different context,
of course -- that the U.S. intelligence receives all of its ground intelligence from Central Asia through Mossad's
network of infiltrator spies -- in other words, whatever "proofs" the U.S. has (and has shown Tony Blair
and NATO) has come exclusively through Sharon via Mossad. The "evidence" so-called, thus, is no counterweight
to this reconstruction of the crime. The "evidence" comes exclusively from the prime "frame-up"
suspect.
Has Mossad done this kind of thing before? Remember the USS Liberty, an American ship with flag flying, deliberatly
attacked and sunk (in multiple attack waves) with efforts to kill every sailor aboard -- either to destroy information
that the ship may have intercepted or to frame Arab states to gain the support of American public opinion. (There
are other cases involving the blowing up of a disco dance nightclub, again to frame targeted enemies -- a case
actually brought to light by the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.)
The coverup apparently has unlimited resources. Two Mossad men caught red handed days after the WTC crashbombings,
were carryhing explosive charges and detonation controls in the government chambers of the Mexican legislature?
Apparently big bribes have been, because these men have been set free.
One surmises that appeals are made to the bogey man of a "destabalizing international crisis" is the
truth were to get out. This is ancient cloak of deviant ruling elites.
How many readers -- even if they strongly suspect that this reconstruction fits the facts -- would not deny the
conclusion anyway because of fear of what this fact would do to Israel's reputation and thus to her security and
survival?
Yet this view may be wrong. If Israeli's on the "good side" were to arrest Sharon and chase down the
renegades of the Mossad "dark side" and bring them to justice -- tensions in the Mideast would dissolve,
and good-faith restored -- good faith that will never return to the world as long as the greatest terror frame-up
in history is not corrected by justice and the truth.
Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly raises the liklihood that Ariel Sharon was also the
man who gave the order for the murder of Yhitzak Rabin, Israel's greatest peacemaker (if that title does not go
to Began for his treaty with Sadat.)
Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering "take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at
last be discredited and that the humanitarian way of Rabin could again be given another chance -- with the Palestinians
gaining restored faith in Israel to be fair and just after seeing Sharon removed and brought to justice.
I know that at this point you are poised to throw the usual tomatoes and call me a "loon" and a "nazi"
-- but I know that those who call me those names are themselves fearful that this analysis may be right.. (And
I forgive you in advance for having to through those tomatoes out of loyalty and not knowing what else to do in
your uncertainty.)
It is a rotten world all around -- but my advice is to seek the truth wherever it leads and then to enforce justice
-- justice against the real authors of the Sept 11 terror, whoever they may be -- to go after Sharon just as strenuously
as you were recently ready to hunt down bin Laden.
And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning of its topmost shelves of power and influence --
a job that we have been putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will benefit from that job!)
(And I should make this clearer: The media are not silent because they are conmplicit in the terror -- they are
silent because they are "yes men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they are not
about to jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see others in their postions doing so. This is consitent
with today's "Dilbert" world of Establishment-monopolized organizations. Only an earth shaking event,
like the exposing of the Establishment's role in the WTC terror, will shake down this system.)
Now, let's discuss this intelligently.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
II. The analysis of the de Grand Pr�
group
The real heroes of the Frame-Up War -- Col. Donn de Grand Pr� (ret.) reports his group's findings:
Retired U.S. Army colonel, Donn de Grand Pr� is the author of Confessions of an Arms Peddler and Window
on America. Here, at last, is the man of solid integrity who has joined like-minded technical experts to get to
the truth.
De Grand Pr�'s letter is truth's first major victory in an information war that has had the good guys at
the mercy of an elusive and consumately deceitful enemy.
Dick Eastman
THE
ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES
by Donn de Grand Pr�
A dedicated group of experienced civilian and military pilots, including combat fighter pilots and commercial airline
captains, just finished a marathon 72 hours of non-stop briefings and debate over the current crisis evolving from
the use of commercial aircraft as cruise missiles against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 11 September.
The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation against the United States, requiring
the utmost professional military skill in command, communications and control. It was flawless in timing, in the
choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided missiles, and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to
their pre-selected targets.
As a tactical military exercise against two significant targets (world financial center and the citadel of world
strategic military planning), the attack, from a psychological impact on the American public, equaled the Japanese
"surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor 7 Dec 1941.
The over-riding question: If we are at war, who is the enemy?
The group determined that the enemy is within the gates, that he has infiltrated into the highest policy-making
positions at the Federal level, and has absolute control, not only of the purse strings, but of the troop build-up
and deployment of our military forces, including active, reserve and National Guard units.
PRELUDE TO PANIC
The 9-11 activity and horrific destruction of US property and lives was intentionally meant to trigger a psychological
and patriotic reaction on the part of the US citizens, which is paving the way for "combined UN activity"
(using the fig leaf of NATO) for striking key targets in both the Middle East/ South Asia and the Balkans. The
goal continues to be ultimate destruction of all national sovereignty and establishment of a global government.
The trigger for the 9-11 activity was the imminent and unstoppable world-wide financial collapse, which can only
be prevented (temporarily) by a major war, perhaps to become known as WW 111. To bring it off (one more time),
martial law will probably be imposed in the United States.
In each of the major wars of the 20th century, the financial manipulators (located in the City of London and New
York City) had placed the US (and much of the Western world) in a monetary expansion mode, followed by an ever-tightening
vice of a gigantic credit squeeze. We now have two ongoing and tightly controlled simultaneous events (emanating
from the two symbolic targets of 911):
1) Alan Greenspan, Fed chairman, promising to flood the market with up
to $200 billion in FRNs and to further lower interest rates, thus bringing about hyperinflation and dollar devaluation.
Much of these multi billions in largesse will be dumped into the coffers of Wall Street, Defense, bankrupt airlines,
insurance companies and into the willing arms of debt-ridden third-world countries in the form of debt repudiation
(forgiveness). Call it bribery, in order to get these often reluctant nations to join our coalition of "freedom
fighters" in "the war against terrorism".
2) Paul Wolfowitz, deputy Defense secretary, promised that the US will launch "sustained military strikes
against those behind the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington". He said that the "military retaliation
would continue until the roots of terrorism are destroyed."
This bit of saber rattling was seconded by select NATO allies (especially Britain), and by our chief ally in the
Middle East, the Butcher of Beirut, Ariel Sharon, while Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld, with the blessings of
Pres. Bush 11, is activating thousands of national guard and reservists, not only to guard the vulnerable airports,
but to do fly-overs of our Nation's capital in F16s from the North Dakota Air Guard. Other National Guard units
are being jockeyed into potential combat "hot spots" throughout the Middle East/South Asia and the Balkans.
WHO IS THE ENEMY?
Following is a summary of the near-unanimous views of the assembled military and civilian pilots concerning certain
critical factors relating to the WTC/Pentagon hit of 9-11:
Troubling questions arose about the alleged pilot-hijackers of the four aircraft, who were supposedly trained on
Cessna aircraft over the past year at fields in Florida and Oklahoma. One General officer remarked, "I seriously
question whether these novices could have located a target dead-on 200 miles removed from takeoff point...-- much
less controlled the flight and mastered the intricacies of 11FR (instrument flight rules) -- and all accomplished
in 45 minutes."
The extremely skillful maneuvering of the three aircraft at near mach speeds, each unerringly hitting their targets,
was superb. As one Air Force officer -- a veteran of over 100 sorties over North Vietnam -- explained, "Those
birds (commercial airliners) either had a crack fighter pilot in the
left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control."
Another pilot warned that "we had better consider whether electro-magnetic pulse or radio frequency weapons
were used from a command and control platform hovering over the Eastern Seaboard... I'm talkin' AWACS."
Another comment: "If there was an AWACS on station over the targeted area, did it have a Global Hawk capability?
I mean, could it convert the commercial jets to robotic flying missiles?
A hotly debated question: Who would be in command of such an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)? Were
they Chinese -- Russians -- Saudis -- Israelis -- NATO ? All of these countries possess AWACS-type aircraft. All
(except the Saudis) have the capability to utilize
electro-magnetic pulsing (EMP) to knock out on-board flight controls and communications of targeted aircraft, and
then, to fly them by remote control.
One of the Air Force officers explained that we had already flown a robot plane the size of a Boeing 737 across
the Pacific to Australia -- unmanned -- from Edwards AF13 in California to a successful landing on an Aussie base
in South Australia. It flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but is "monitored" (controlled remotely)
by a pilot from an outside station.
He explained that the London Economist (20 Sep 2001) published comments from the former CEO of British Airways,
Robert Ayling, who stated that an aircraft could be commandeered from the ground or air and controlled remotely
in the event of a hijack.
COMMERCIAL JETS AS GUIDED MISSILES
An AP story, dateline Brussels - 7 Oct 01 -- "At Washington's request, NATO will soon deploy surveillance
aircraft for anti-terrorist operations in the United States in response to the attacks on New York and Washington,
NATO officials said Sunday, an unprecedented use of foreign military forces to defend the U.S. homeland."
The assembled group of pilots debated why we would ask for foreign forces to fly AWACS over our sovereign territory
when we have a fleet of 33 of them, of which 28 are stationed in Oklahoma. The debate also centered on whether
such NATO surveillance aircraft were already here prior to 11 September.
Could one of them have commandeered the four airliners?
There seems to be wide discrepancies between what the Federal government is proclaiming -- and their media moguls
reporting -- as opposed to the calm and reasoned and rational views of those men who fly the planes and defend
the nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
This writer has been a general aviation pilot since 1946. 1 have flown a variety of single engine prop aircraft
since, and installed an FAA-approved airstrip here on my farm in 1980. Two local pilots periodically joined me
for short hops; one, a Madison County lawyer, a graduate of the Air Force
Academy, who flew for the Air Force before coming home to practice law.
The other, Kent Hill, who lives with his wife, Carol, on a farm close to mine, is an American Airlines captain
assigned to the European route. He was a lifelong friend of "Chic" Burlingame, They were graduates of
the Naval Academy and flew F-4 Phantoms in Vietnam. Both left the Navy 28 years ago and joined American Airlines.
Both planned to retire in 2002. Chic was the captain of AA flight 77, a Boeing 757, which departed Washington Dulles
for Los Angeles at 8: 10 am on I I September, with 58 passengers and a crew of 6. Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon
at 9:41 am.
"We were totally trained on the old type of hijack," Capt Hill said, "where you treat the hijacker
cordially, punch a 4-digit code into your transponder to alert ground control you're being hijacked, and then get
him where he wants to go, set the plane safely on the ground and let them deal with it on
the ground. However, this is a totally new situation... Not one of the planes alerted ground control that they
were being hijacked." How come?
"The fact is, all the transponders were turned off on the doomed flights virtually at the same time."
Look at their departure times -- two from Logan (Boston), one from Newark, another from Dulles (Washington DC)
-- all between 8 am and 8:15.
"Shortly after climb-out to flight level, their transponders are de-activated.. (they are no longer a blip
on the radar screens). This is something that really needs to be looked into. The only reason we turn them off
is so they don't interfere with ground systems when we land."
(Note: Transponders identify a particular aircraft in flight on the radar screens of FAA flight controllers located
throughout the country. Various codes are punched into the transponder, one displaying, "I am being hijacked.")
Although there is much talk among the various flight crews, Hill says they are not privy to any of the investigations
into the events of I I September. "We're in the dark -- very much so ... They're playing it pretty tight to
the vest."
He is convinced none of the pilots had control of their aircraft when they were flown into the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon. The question then becomes, who was really in control?
"Even if I had a gun at my head, I'd never fly a plane into a building. I'd try to put it in anywhere -- a
field or a river --and I'd be searing the hell out of them (the hijackers) by flying upside down first," Hill
said.
In fact, the pilot has the best weapon in his hand when threatened with imminent death by a hijacker, namely, the
airplane.
Another airline pilot stated. "On hearing a major scuffle in the cabin, the pilot should have inverted the
aircraft and the hijackers end up with broken necks."
That none of the four pilots executed such a maneuver points toward the fact that none of them had control of their
aircraft, but had been overridden by an outside force, which was flying them by remote control.
As an old and not so bold pilot, I became more convinced that the four commercial jets were choreographed by a
"conductor" from a central source, namely an airborne warning and control system (AWACS). They have the
electronic capability to engage several aircraft simultaneously, knock out their on-board flight controls by EMP
(electro-magnetic pulsing) and assume command and remote control of these targeted aircraft.
As we consider all the options -- and enemies -- who performed this act of war, whether from China, Russia, Israel,
an Islamic country, or from NATO, we must also consider that the enemy may be within the gates.
If so, then we are dealing with high treason.
IS THERE A CHINA - ISRAEL CONNECTION?
Under a heading "High-powered Microwave weapons' (Regnery Pub 1999) reported:, the authors of Red Dragon Rising,
High-powered microwave weapons (sometimes known as radio frequency weapons) which the PLA calls the 'superstars'
of warfare, represent the new armaments that may define twenty-first century warfare. These very dangerous weapons
can jam electronic equipment by emitting an extremely powerful pulse of electromagnetic energy over a wide area,
or their energy can be focused in a narrow beam for use against American satellites I or commercial airliners -
Ed 1.
In that startling and factual work, the authors highlight the exceptional efforts on the part of the PLA to acquire
the latest hi-tech data from the United States, especially for the "superstars of radio frequency and electro-magnetic
pulse weaponry." In their chapter on "Targeting America", the authors refer to a bipartisan Cox-Dicks
Committee given the task to investigate "U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial concerns with the
Peoples Republic of China".
They point out that the Clinton administration changed the export control regulations (Jan 1996) and that by the
end of 1998 the PRC had 600 American super computers.
In 1997-98 the Congressional Joint Economic Committee held hearings on "Radio Frequency Weapons and Proliferation:
Potential Impact on the Economy". Several experts appearing before the Committee warned that these weapons
pose a distinct threat to the United States. It was revealed during the hearings that China (PLA) has had a high-powered
microwave weapon program for 25 years under the direction of one of many Chinese students educated at Berkeley
over the years.
The key statement was that the PLA has access to American research -- "through espionage".
Let's fast-forward to 1999 and to a New York Times Op Ed piece by A. M. Rosenthal (22 Oct 1999), in which he described
the long-secret arms deals between Israel and Red China He was the managing editor of the New York Times for 15
years prior to that article appearing and a dedicated
supporter of Israel. However, as a result of that article, he was fired.
The title of his Op Ed was "The Deadly Cargo", and the lead sets the theme:
More often now, the special cargo arrives in China from Israel -- riles from Israeli military computers, crates
with the makings of missiles and other weapons, and the men in the lab coats, the engineers and scientists who
know how to put it all together...
And now I see the Chinese minister of defense, who is one of the ranking Tiananmen killers, visits Israel. I read
obsequious Israeli speeches praising him and his government...
The two countries talk openly about bigger arms deals in the making. I learn that the Chinese have knit together
Russian and Israeli specialties...
The Russians are converting Ilyushin planes into the framework of U.S.-type flying command posts (AWACS) and will
ship them to Israel...
In an astounding interview by Tom Valentine (24 Oct 1999) on Radio Free America with Andrew St. George the two
developed the emerging scandal of Israel's secret arms deal with Red China. They referred to the Cox Committee
hearings and stated that "unfortunately , the official Cox 'investigation' into China's capture of American
technology covered up Israel's involvement."
Valentine stressed that the Reagan administration allowed the trade to escalate in the 1980s, with the help and
encouragement of such officials as Richard Perle, Stephen Bryen, Fred Ickle and Paul Wolfowitz ..."They were
the kingpins of the Defense Department in the Reagan years."
In case you missed it, they are now back as key advisers to President Bush II; in fact, the leading war hawk pressing
for our armed forces to go to war against the Muslim World is the Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz.
We are being deluged by the current crop of Israel Firsters, all shouting "It's time to declare war".
and "First war of 21st Century" ( Alan Dershowitz on CNN - William Kristol, Washington Times - Leonard
Piekoff, Washington Post)), and former Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu,
appearing before the U.S. Congress,
QUO VADIS? (Whither Goest?)
To better grasp where we are heading (other than to the Khyber Pass), we can dip back to recent history (Vietnam,
Korea, Desert Storm, Kosovo) to get a better focus of the direction we are going, even though our commander-in-chief
has yet to define the specific enemy.
"Terrorism is like sin; everybody is agin'it."
To those of us who have actually engaged an enemy (often contrived) on the battlefield, and/or who have an-n-chaired
other wars from a vantage point, say, the E-Ring of the Pentagon, the pomposity and solemnity and the speechifying
of our fearless politicians, as well as their favorite talking heads on the idiot box, is eerily familiar. It is
in fact d~ja vous all over again.
Once again, we will rely on "perpetual war for perpetual peace" to bring us out of the abyss of a major
financial collapse. We either turn out the Barbarians Inside the Gates, or we prepare for the long dark night of
no return. There is no longer a third option.
It's curtain call at the Little Theater off Times Square... Be There!
(Donn de Grand M, a retired Army colonel, is author of A Window on America, Confessions of an Arms Peddler and
his latest, Barbarians Inside the Gates (see attached ad).)
for more detailed view of air routes see:
www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gflightpath2/flash.htm
Next I will supply information on the two criminal cases in which critical
evidence and files were destroyed. (The Iran Oil Swap case and the gold price fixing case.)
911 - TERROR IN AMERICA Part 1
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_part1.htm
911 - TERROR IN AMERICA Part 2
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc_part2.htm
911 - TERROR IN AMERICA Part 3
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc_part3.htm
911 - TERROR IN AMERICA Part 4
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc_part4.htm
Without Justice there is Just_Us!
American Patriot Friends Network
"...a network of net workers..."
Email: apfn@apfn.org
